yes, yes, and what are YOUR views… on DailyBooth

lexcanroar

Message

Report

January 23rd, 2010

56 views

yes, yes, and what are YOUR views on Piaget's theory of cognitive development?

iforgotmyonlinename
#0

Reply

:|

yes.. i agree with your views and what you say... uhuuh, 100%

;) <3

January 23rd, 2010
deathcase
#0

Reply

yes, yes, i totally agree *nod nod*

January 23rd, 2010
countcube69
#0

Reply

Grrrr, I used to know this, my ex had to do a lot of work on it...

But I can't for the life of me remember it... I think I disagreed with him, but that may have been to cause a silly playfight...

January 23rd, 2010
camistryy
#0

Reply

Yes, everything you say. *nod*
°__°

January 23rd, 2010
doug
#0

Reply

errr i think it's wank

January 23rd, 2010
loliminvisible
#0

Reply

AAAH.
I did that essay in 1st year o__________o

Really though, for that whole section of the course I just spent every lecture counting the amount of times my lecturer said "Piaget"; she loved the man xD

January 23rd, 2010
Sam_
#0

Reply

Yes it's very *mumbles in posh accent so you can't understand* Know what I mean? :)

January 23rd, 2010
sunnymann
#0

Reply

lol nice

January 23rd, 2010
Laurathesmall
#0

Reply

I think that it is a rather accurate way to sum up the way that children learn best as it allows the child to explore the world for themselves and learn in their own way but have an adult to help guide them through it which makes the social constructivist theory better than the laissez-faire theory (child led) and transmission theory (adult led).

I know a little too much about these theories *is currently doing c/w on it* :)

January 23rd, 2010
countcube69
#0

Reply

@Laurathesmall I must have been thinking about a different one then...

January 23rd, 2010
Laurathesmall
#0

Reply

@countcube69 you might be right.. this is just what i've been taught in childcare haha :)

January 23rd, 2010
countcube69
#0

Reply

@Laurathesmall no, I'm wrong, cos that seems pretty logical and sensible. I know there was one I used to annoy my ex with cos it was a load of pants.

January 23rd, 2010
ohheytherelaura
#0

Reply

I think he made the questions confusing! :)

January 23rd, 2010
lexcanroar
#0

Reply

Actually you guys, Piaget's theory actually underestimated what children could do due to his poor methodology, challenged by studies such as Donaldson's, McGarrigle & Donaldson's, and Bower and Wishart's. The idea of splitting development into seperate stages is quite misleading, as children could effectively 'straddle' more than one at once. Research by Meadows found that direct peer tutoring could speed up learning, which Piaget didn't account for. Although cross-cultural studies have confirmed that this model of cognitive development is universal and therefore probably biological, Piaget put far too much focus on the cognitive and ignored social and emotional factors. However, his theory did provide strong opportunities for application to education.

January 23rd, 2010
Laurathesmall
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar that's exactly what i said. but just in smaller words and easier to understand :) ...sort of. no.

January 23rd, 2010
deathcase
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar - headache o.o

January 23rd, 2010
andyisenglish
#0

Reply

yeah guys! how can you not know that!
i just didn't want to say, you know, to give you all a chance...

January 23rd, 2010
KateyMatey
#0

Reply

So glad I dropped psychology right now.

January 23rd, 2010
countcube69
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar that kinda makes sense, I think some of it's returning to me... but I didn't know that much to start off with so... meh, I've relearnt something today, thanks for that :)

January 23rd, 2010
yumemi
#0

Reply

Ohgosh. :/
What bit of psychology is this?
I've never had to learn Piaget's theory of cognitive development during my two years of studying A-Level psychology. :P

January 23rd, 2010
lexcanroar
#0

Reply

@yumemi it's for my A2 exam this week, on friday. I'm doing Gender, Relationships and Cognitive Development. ughhhh.

January 23rd, 2010
yumemi
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar A real one or a mock? GOOD LUCK ANYWAY! =]
Ohdeaarz. I did Relationships, Evolutionary Psychology and the one about sleep, dreaming and body clocks.

January 23rd, 2010
lexcanroar
#0

Reply

@yumemi a real one :( I'M SCREWED.

January 23rd, 2010
saskiajulie
#0

Reply

Good luck with your exam. I'm doing relationships, aggression and biological rhythms on friday. I reckon relationships will be a breeeze! The others are insanely long - so many researchers names to remember! fdlsfjlks

January 23rd, 2010
yumemi
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar Eek! You'll do fiiiiiine! Just remember the important names and try and rant and waffle on about them. That tends to get a few marks.
And don't panic. Like I do. :P
@saskiajulie BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS! That's what the sleep/dreaming/body clocks was properly called. :P Good luck with your exam if you're doing the same one on Friday! =]

January 23rd, 2010
PJ
#0

Reply

I agree.

January 23rd, 2010
BonMauvaiseBelle
#0

Reply

Good luck for your exam :)

January 23rd, 2010
crimsong19
#0

Reply

Umm ... *thinks back to AP Psych* *can't remember anything about Piagett*

January 23rd, 2010
Francis
#0

Reply

TIGERS!

January 25th, 2010
amybee
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar you ever see piaget, you tell him he can suck it from me!
bloody schemas, assimilation, accomodation bleeeeeh being a teacher best be worth having to write essay upon essay about him!

January 25th, 2010
amybee
#0

Reply

@lexcanroar that eminem/fred durst style pose up there was aimed at piaget NOT YOU haha :D

January 25th, 2010