Glad you were at the beach, and not on it, however, could you kindly go a little further with your clarifications for us humble mortals, in the future, as your photo looks nothing like being "at a beach" to me.
Neutral is a good place to be, well done on your achievement
Again, I simply stated that I was at the beach taking pictures. This doesn't then mean that I should have to show you a picture of an actual beach area. How does it make any sense to dispute that in the first place?
If I had said "I went and took pictures of the beach today, here is a picture of the beach" then it would be reasonable to expect that the picture displayed, would be of an actual beach.
I think you are being aggressive, whether you realize it yourself or not, because you are insecure about my not responding to your flirtatious PM that you sent me on here, therefore you initially attempted to make me feel 'stupid' (and therefore, try to gain some kind power over me, in your mind) for simply mentioning that I went to take photos at a beach and then not actually showing you a picture of a recognisable beach area.
Because I rejected your first criticism, you could not gain any power in your communications with me, so you resort to using sarcasm and condecension in your latest reply, even though I was not actually attacking you. Even in my initial reply to yours, where I posed a simple question, you already felt like we might be arguing? But why would you feel that way? Because you did not illicit the response in me with your first comment, that you were actually hoping for.
Your replies are most likely to be irrational reactions based on insecurity. Because your reasoning to begin with is inherently irrational, which signifies some kind of emotional imbalance on your end.